As a member of a modular club, I would only be "partly" responsible if the layout is terrible! |
Many report struggles with other members who are overly rigid about the adherence to a particular prototype, strict layout
standards, etc. At the other end of the scale, others complain about members
who are too flippant in their approach to modeling. It seems most
club members have experienced at least some level of squabbling, difficult
personalities and political infighting.
I’m sure most of you know how this goes. One member wants to
model the transition era of a specific railroad; the other wants the rules
relaxed so modern diesels can run alongside steam locomotives (including an HO
version of Thomas the Tank Engine). Some members want a longstanding club to
make the switch to DCC; others don’t see the sense in spending money to replace
a block control system that’s worked well for years.
Almost any group, in any hobby, experiences these kinds of
issues. It’s hard, if not impossible, to get a group of people who all want to
row the boat in the same direction at all times.
This is partly what makes modular model railroading so
appealing to me. You’re still part of a group, still get to run trains and
share the hobby with others, but you’re also free to do what you want with your
little bit of the layout (within the design standard parameters of course).
You can model as much or as little as you want, see and learn from what others have done and when the day’s done, your layout comes home with you (in
most cases). Any interpersonal annoyances are minimized because you don’t have
to iron out the intricacies of layout planning with three dozen other people.
Like anything, there are tradeoffs. My sense is that it’s
more difficult for a modular club to achieve the same level of realism as a
permanent club layout whose members have all agreed to put their collective efforts
toward recreating a particular prototype.
Take the Waterloo Region Model Railway Club as an example. Although
based in southwestern Ontario, the club models Canadian Pacific operations in
Northern Ontario in the 1970s. I’ve not seen the layout myself but the results
look amazing on the club’s website.
Obviously every member has agreed to this plan and as a
statement on the club’s website explains, the adherence to such a specific prototype
has actually helped the membership avoid infighting.
“By choosing a specific prototype, no one
individual or internal group could determine what the WRMRC will or will not
model, because the prototype railway has already dictated how it must be done,”
reads the statement. “The
decision to model a prototype freed us from a lot of undesirable politics, and
united us towards a common goal.”
Interesting. Still I’m keen on checking out an HO scale modular
club, which I also think better suits my (rather limited) skills as a modeller. There doesn’t appear to be one in Toronto proper, but if anyone knows of one or is
interested in talking about it, please email me at back.on.track@bell.net.
As for my layout .... I've got track and wiring to complete and only recently addressed a pressing wire shortage, which was holding up progress. Update soon.
Looking forward to future progress! Incidentally, I've heard that Lambton Yard is closed now....is that true?
ReplyDeleteI can't say for sure Jeremy because I have no personal contact with anyone who works at Canadian Pacific, but I have noticed that locomotives are rarely parked near the yard office on Runnymede anymore. I know CP is downsizing and the Obico container terminal appears to be closed. There is some rolling stock on the tracks at Lambton, but operations there definitely appear to be scaled back from even a few weeks ago. Anyone who knows anything please send me info at back.on.track@bell.net and I will do a more complete post about this. You can feed me info anonymously! Thanks for the comment Jeremy.
ReplyDelete